A message to the leadership of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, from a community of faithful believers who have not stopped hoping.
Read the CallThis call comes from a convert of 33 years, baptized at 15 after a transformative encounter with the Book of Mormon, who served a mission baptizing nearly 50 souls, taught at the MTC for three years, piloted Preach My Gospel before publication, served in two bishoprics, and married in the Timpanogos Temple on December 21st, 2000.
It comes from a man who read the scriptures daily, who received direct revelation, who wept for joy at what the gospel of Jesus Christ is. A man who still believes. A man who, on Easter Sunday, felt the Lord ask him to step away from a corrupted institution, not from Christ.
He and a small community now hold sacrament meetings in their home, read the scriptures daily, pray together, tithe to the poor, and share the doctrine of Christ. They have not left the gospel. They grieve that the gospel has been obscured.
"Read the books, not the books about the books."
Counsel given to a young convert wrestling with hard questionsThe questions that follow are not born of cynicism. They are born of love: love for the restoration, love for the scriptures, love for the Savior whose church this is supposed to be. They deserve answers.
Hundreds of thousands of members have placed these questions on the proverbial shelf. Returning missionaries are leaving. Youth are leaving. Not because they stopped believing in Christ, but because the institution's answers, when they come at all, do not satisfy the soul shaped by the Book of Mormon. These are your questions too.
Why do we follow a living prophet even when he contradicts the dispensation head Joseph Smith, or Christ himself?
Joseph Smith explicitly warned against depending on the prophet rather than receiving personal revelation. The current doctrine of prophetic infallibility has no scriptural basis and no counterbalancing mechanism of correction or accountability.
If the 1978 priesthood revelation was from God, what does that tell us about the decades of exclusion that preceded it? Who bears responsibility for that harm?
We cannot have it both ways: either previous prophets erred grievously on a matter of eternal salvation for millions of souls, or the 1978 change was not from God. Either answer demands a serious institutional response that has never come.
How can ordinances "instituted in the heavens before the foundation of the world" be repeatedly altered by committees and correlation?
Joseph Smith taught that salvific ordinances were fixed before the earth was formed. The endowment has been substantially changed multiple times in living memory. No revelation has been offered to justify this. Isaiah 24:5 identifies changed ordinances as a mark of apostasy.
The 2015 policy barring children of gay couples from baptism was called a revelation. Its 2019 reversal: what was that?
When the November 2015 policy was disclosed, Elder Christofferson stated it came through revelation. When it was reversed in 2019, no explanation was given. If a revelation can be reversed without comment within four years, what does the word revelation mean to the institution?
Where is our Mother in Heaven? Why have sustained prophets, seers, and revelators not sought and received an answer to offer the Church?
The existence of a Heavenly Mother is one of the most beautiful and distinctive doctrines to emerge from the restoration. Yet members are discouraged from praying to her, no revelation about her nature has been received, and her role in our salvation remains entirely unexplored. The silence is not sacred. It is an abdication of prophetic responsibility.
The Church has amassed extraordinary wealth in auxiliary entities. How does this square with the poor whose tithing funds it?
In 2023 the SEC fined the Church $5 million for using shell companies to obscure its estimated $100 billion investment portfolio from public view. Members sacrifice a tenth of their income believing it serves the Kingdom of God and the poor. This accumulation has never been transparently justified.
When was the last canonized, content-laden revelation added to our scriptures? Why has more than a century passed in silence?
The Doctrine and Covenants was a living record of divine communication through the early restoration. Since the early 20th century no new revelation has been added to our canon. If God speaks today as He did to Joseph, where is the record of it?
Joseph Smith warned: the people "were depending on the prophet hence were darkened in their minds." Are we that people?
The phrase "follow the prophet" has become the defining creed of modern Latter-day Saint culture. It is found nowhere in scripture. Joseph warned in 1842 that this very dependence produces spiritual darkness. The correlation program has systematically replaced personal revelation with institutional obedience.
"All truth should fit into a complete framework. Any contradictions were likely due to our misunderstanding."
A conviction held for 33 years, now tested by the institution itselfThe Savior was not silent about what would happen to the Gentile church in the latter days. He spoke plainly. He said when, not if. And he offered a path of return.
"At that day when the Gentiles shall sin against my gospel, and shall reject the fulness of my gospel, and shall be lifted up in the pride of their hearts above all nations... and shall be filled with all manner of lyings, and of deceits, and of mischiefs, and all manner of hypocrisy, and murders, and priestcrafts, and whoredoms, and of secret abominations... behold, saith the Father, I will bring the fulness of my gospel from among them."
The word is when, not if. The Lord anticipated this. The question is whether the institution will recognize itself in the mirror of prophecy.
"But if the Gentiles will repent and return unto me, saith the Father, behold they shall be numbered among my people, O house of Israel."
The door is not closed. Repentance is available to institutions, not only to individuals. The Lord is quick to forgive when we repent.
"The earth also is defiled under the inhabitants thereof; because they have transgressed the laws, changed the ordinance, broken the everlasting covenant."
Changing immutable ordinances is not a small administrative matter. The prophets of Israel saw it as defilement. So did Joseph Smith, who warned that ordinances "are not to be altered or changed."
"The people should each one stand for himself and depend on no man or men... they were depending on the prophet hence were darkened in their minds from neglect of themselves."
The dispensation head warned us. The phrase "follow the prophet" does not appear in scripture. The over-reliance on prophetic authority that Joseph identified as darkness is the very doctrine now taught as salvation.
These are not anti-Mormon talking points. They are documented matters of Church history and policy, each with primary sources. They deserve a response worthy of a church that claims to be led by living revelation.
This is not a demand for the Church's dissolution. It is the opposite. It is a plea for the Church to become what it claims to be: the body of Christ, a light to the nations, a house of truth. Institutions, like individuals, can repent. And when they do, the Lord is quick to forgive.
"Could we become a 'true and living church' with which the Lord would be pleased collectively? This was always His hope for us. That we would abide in Him and He in us."
Peter Morkel, Mapleton, Utah, March 2026People are leaving in droves, not because the gospel is false, but because they learned to love the gospel and the institution no longer reflects it. They leave because the Book of Mormon taught them what Christ looks like, and they do not see Him in the institution's legalism, wealth, and silence.
But "if the Gentiles will repent and return unto me" -- those words were written for this moment. The promise is real. The harvest is still possible. The Lord has not given up on His church. We have not given up on His church.
Would Brother Joseph be welcome if he preached in a modern sacrament meeting? That is the question this generation must answer.
"We can preserve the restoration and repent and return to the pure teachings the Lord gave to Joseph Smith. We can embrace the Book of Mormon and overcome the condemnation from the beginning of this dispensation."
3 Nephi 16:13 | D&C 84:54-58 | A letter to Presidents Oaks, Eyring, and Christofferson, March 2026A small community of believers, seekers, and the sincerely curious gathers each week to study the scriptures, ask honest questions, and pursue the doctrine of Christ together. All are welcome. No commitment required.
Come as you are. Bring your shelf. Bring your questions. Bring your love for the Book of Mormon and your frustration with the institution. This is a space for honest conversation about the restoration and the doctrine of Christ.
Register to Join →Free · Open to all · Registration takes under a minute